MEMICS
MEMICS
Annual Doctoral Workshop on Mathematical and
Engineering Methods in Computer Science
 
organized jointly by the Masaryk University
and the Brno University of Technology, Czechia
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
NEWS
 
October 14—16, 2011    My Hotel    Lednice    Czech Republic
 

Saddek Bensalem
VERIMAG, University Joseph Fourier/CNRS/INPG, Grenoble, France
Rigorous Component-based System Design Using the BIP Framework
Rigorous system design requires use of a single powerful component framework allowing a representation of the designed system at different levels of detail, from a high-level model of application software to its implementation. The use of a single framework allows one to maintain overall coherency and correctness by comparing different architectural solutions and their properties. In this talk, I will first present the BIP (Behaviour, Interaction, Priority) component framework which encompasses an expressive notion of composition for heterogeneous components by combining interactions and priorities. This allows description at different levels of abstraction from high-level application software to mixed hardware/software systems. Second, I will introduce a rigorous design approach that uses BIP as a unifying semantic model to derive from an application software, a model of the target architecture and a mapping, a correct implementation. Correctness of implementation is ensured by application of source-to-source transformations in BIP which preserve correctness of essential design properties. The design is fully automated and supported by a toolset including a compiler, the D-Finder verification tool, and model transformers. We illustrate the use of BIP as a modelling formalism as well as crucial aspects of the design flow for ensuring correctness, through an autonomous robot case study.

Peter Bentley
University College London, United Kingdom
Modelling Complex Systems - Lessons from the Life Sciences
Our technology is becoming increasing complex. Not just complicated, but complex in the sense that the behaviour of a system may be unpredictable. Peter Bentley describes his work in complex systems, providing examples of various collaborations with biologists in areas such as evolution, development, and cancer research. He describes how many of the underlying principles can be modelled, not only to improve our understanding of the biology, but also in order to provide new technologies that exploit those principles. Through this work he aims to investigate the technologies of the future - devices that can adapt, be fault tolerant, and even assemble themselves. Examples of a self-repairing robot, physical self-assembling systems will be shown, and he will describe his systemic computer concept which aims to be the first parallel fault tolerant computer that is based on general biological systems. Through examples such as these, he argues that while we may never be able to predict exactly what a complex system may do, that does not prevent such systems from being extremely useful for us - after all, we are unpredictable complex systems ourselves.

Krishnendu Chatterjee
IST Austria, Austria
Games and Probabilistic Systems with Mean-payoff, Energy and Parity Objectives
The analysis of games and probabilistic systems with quantitative objectives (such as mean-payoff and energy objectives) and \omega-regular objectives (such as parity objectives) provide the mathematical foundation for performance analysis and verification of various classes of systems. In this talk, we will present a survey of both classical results and recent results about mean-payoff, energy, and parity objectives. We will discuss about how to solve their combinations, their inter-relationship, and mention interesting open problems.

Goerschwin Fey
University of Bremen, Germany
Assessing System Vulnerability using Formal Verification Techniques
Hardware systems are becoming more and more vulnerable to soft errors caused by radiation or process variations. Design measures to cope with these problems are built into the system. But how to verify that the final system is as resilient as expected?
The presentation will consider soft errors caused e.g. by electrical bugs or radiation. Automatic approaches to analyze the effect of such faults on the system will be presented. The presentation will briefly cover modeling issues related to assessing fault tolerance, e.g. which abstraction level is appropriate for the analysis, what are potential pitfalls and what kind of models will be required. Based on this analysis existing approaches will be briefly introduced that analyze faults on the electrical as well as the logical level. Their trade-offs regarding resource requirements and quality of results will be discussed and the individual advantages highlighted. One approach suitable for assessment on the gate level and above will be explained in detail. Extensions to improve the performance using approximation approaches will be considered. Use-cases of the resulting robustness checker tool will illustrate the practical application of the techniques.

Renato Renner
ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Security in a quantum world
In this talk, I address the question whether classical cryptographic systems are secure against attacks by an adversary equipped with quantum devices. This question is of increasing relevance as such devices may be built in the near future (although the construction of a full-fledged quantum computer is currently out of reach). As an example, I will demonstrate that a cryptographic scheme may be susceptible to quantum attacks even if it is provably secure against any classical adversary. (This talk does not require prior knowledge in quantum mechanics.)

Petr Tuma
Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
Computer Memory: Why We Should Care What Is Under The Hood
The memory subsystems of contemporary computer architectures are increasingly complex - in fact, so much so that it becomes difficult to estimate the performance impact of many coding constructs, and some long known coding patterns are even discovered to be principally wrong. In contrast, many researchers still reason about algorithmic complexity in simple terms, where memory operations are sequential and of equal cost. The goal of this talk is to give an overview of some memory subsystem features that violate this assumption significantly, with the ambition to motivate development of algorithms tailored to contemporary computer architectures.

 
 
MEMICS Photo
 
MEMICS
 
Copyright © FI MU
Copyright © FIT VUT
Brno, 2005–2011
FIFIT
Photos and Design